Editorial standards

How we report, test and correct.

The rules every story on 9to5 AI follows. If we fall short of them, tell us — and we’ll say so publicly.

01 — Sourcing

We link primary sources: release notes, documentation, filings, papers and the product itself. When we rely on a person, we say who they are and how they know.

We grant anonymity only when a source would face real harm, and we say why in the story. Anonymous claims are corroborated before publication.

02 — Original testing

We pay for the subscriptions we test. Vendors never see results, scores or copy before publication. Hands-on pieces record the exact versions and hardware under “Tested on”.

Benchmarks follow a public, versioned methodology, and raw data is published under CC BY 4.0. Read the methodology.

03 — Updates

When a story changes materially — new facts, new figures, a changed conclusion — we add a timestamped note at the top and update the “Updated” time. Typo fixes and formatting changes don’t get a note and don’t change the date.

04 — Corrections

Errors of fact are corrected as soon as we confirm them, with a note at the end of the story saying what was wrong. Significant corrections are also listed on our corrections page.

Write to corrections@9to5ai.tech; we usually fix errors the same day.

05 — Headlines

Headlines say what happened. Search headlines lead with the subject; social headlines are specific and never withhold the point to earn a click.

06 — Use of AI

Every story is reported and written by a person. We may use AI tools to transcribe interviews, check translations and run the tests we describe. When a tool materially shaped a story, the story says so.

We never publish AI-generated articles, and we don’t use AI to generate images presented as real.

07 — Independence & conflicts

No company can pay for coverage, placement, a score or a ranking. Staff disclose investments and relationships on their byline pages, and don’t cover companies they hold stakes in.

08 — Embargoes

We honour embargoes we agree to in advance. We don’t trade favourable coverage for access, and we don’t agree to show copy to the companies we cover.

Questions

Something here unclear, or a story that falls short?

Report an error