PolicyNews

Italy's AI law: from October 23, a human must make the final call on AI-assisted hiring and firing

Italy's AI law on hiring and firing: since October 23, 2026, Legislative Decree 179/2026 requires that final decisions on hiring, changes to employment, dismissals, discipline and performance reviews made with AI rest with a person who has real decision-making power. What Article 41 requires, what it excludes, and how it relates to the EU AI Act.

Timeline at true spacing: a glass tile for October 2025, a lit tile for October 23, 2026 and a dashed tile for December 2027, on amber, titled October 23, 2026

What’s new, in 20 seconds

  1. Italy's Legislative Decree No. 179 of October 7, 2026, published in the Gazzetta Ufficiale (No. 234) on October 8, took effect on October 23, 2026. It adapts Italian law to the EU AI Act under the delegation in Italy's AI law, Law No. 132 of September 23, 2025.
  2. Article 41 says employers using AI must ensure final decisions on hiring, changing or ending employment, including discipline and performance reviews, aren't based solely on automated processing; the final decision is 'reserved to a natural person' with effective and autonomous power. Candidate search and screening is excluded.
  3. A dismissal that breaks the rule is null, and so is any other decision taken in breach of it. Workers' consent doesn't lift the ban. The EU AI Act's own high-risk rules for employment AI apply from December 2, 2027.
Contents

Italy's AI law on hiring and firing took effect on Friday, October 23, 2026. Legislative Decree No. 179/2026, which adapts Italian law to the EU AI Act, says employers that use AI can't base final decisions on hiring, changing or ending someone's employment solely on automated processing. The final decision is "in any case reserved to a natural person" with effective and autonomous power. The rule arrives more than a year before the AI Act's own high-risk rules for employment AI, which apply from December 2, 2027, as our AI Act timeline explains.

This story is based on the decree's entry on Normattiva, Italy's official legislation database, the Gazzetta Ufficiale's own text of Articles 41 and 42, and analyses by EcNews and Diritto.it, checked October 25, 2026. Italian quotes are 9to5AI's translations. This article describes the law; it isn't legal advice.

The short version

  • The law: Legislative Decree No. 179 of October 7, 2026, Gazzetta Ufficiale No. 234 of October 8, 2026, in force October 23, 2026.
  • The rule (Article 41): AI can't be the sole basis for final decisions on hiring, changes to employment, dismissal, discipline or performance reviews. A person with real power must decide.
  • The carve-out: searching for and screening candidates doesn't count as a final hiring decision, even when it excludes someone from later stages.
  • Consent doesn't help: "The worker's consent does not constitute an exception to the prohibition."
  • The consequence: a dismissal in breach is null, as is any other decision taken in breach.

What does Italy's Decree 179/2026 require of employers?

Article 41 is titled "Protection of the worker in decision-making processes assisted by artificial intelligence systems." It has four parts:

Article 41What it says
Paragraph 1Employers using AI systems must ensure final decisions on hiring, modifying or ending employment, including disciplinary measures and performance evaluations, "are not adopted solely on the basis of automated processing." The decision is reserved to a person with "effective and autonomous" power. Candidate search and screening isn't a final decision. Worker consent is no exception. GDPR Article 22 still applies.
Paragraph 2AI use must respect workers' dignity, confidentiality and the principle of non-discrimination.
Paragraph 3Before processing starts, employers must give the information required by Article 1-bis of Legislative Decree 152/1997. On request, a worker gets an intelligible explanation, through a person, of how much the AI system weighed in the decision and its main parameters. GDPR rights under Articles 13, 15 and 22 remain.
Paragraph 4"A dismissal issued in breach of paragraph 1 is null." Any other employer decision taken in breach of paragraph 1 is also null.

Table 1The rule covers the final decision, not every use of AI in HR, and screening is expressly excluded. Source: Legislative Decree 179/2026, Article 41, Gazzetta Ufficiale No. 234 (October 8, 2026).

Last verified: October 25, 2026

EcNews, a professional publication for Italian accountants and labor consultants, reads the decree's "effective and autonomous" test as a power that is "effective and autonomous, not merely formal"; the words "not merely formal" are EcNews's, not the decree's. It also noted the decree doesn't define in practice what makes human review effective. That's the open question for employers: a manager who rubber-stamps an AI recommendation may not meet the standard, but the decree doesn't spell out where the line is.

Article 42 adds a workplace-safety duty. Where AI affects work organization, pace, how work is done or safety decisions, it must be assessed in the employer's risk assessment under Article 28 of Legislative Decree 81/2008, and workers must be informed and trained on the specific risks.

What are the penalties?

For the employment rule, the decree's consequence is nullity, not a fine. A dismissal made in breach of Article 41 is null, which under Italian law means it has no legal effect, and other decisions taken in breach are void too. Diritto.it's analysis notes the decree doesn't spell out further consequences for Article 41.

The decree also has a separate sanctions section (Articles 19–25) that sets fines in four tiers of up to €35 million or 7% of worldwide annual turnover, mirroring the AI Act's Article 99. Those fines apply to the parties listed in the AI Act's Article 99(1) and are imposed by Italy's AI authorities, including the Agency for Digital Italy (AgID) and the National Cybersecurity Agency (ACN). The decree's text doesn't link those fines to Article 41, so it would overstate the law to say an employer faces millions in fines for an AI-made dismissal.

How does this relate to the EU AI Act?

The EU AI Act lists "employment, workers' management and access to self-employment" as one of the high-risk areas in Annex III (point 4), according to Germany's AI market surveillance authority, the Bundesnetzagentur; it covers AI such as hiring tools. After the AI Omnibus, those obligations apply from December 2, 2027, as covered in our explainer on the AI Act's dates. Italy's Article 41 is a national labor rule that applies from October 23, 2026, and covers decisions, not the design of AI systems.

Italy's AI employment rules and the EU AI Act

  1. Oct 10, 2025Italy's AI law, Law No. 132/2025, takes effectConfirmed
  2. Oct 8, 2026Decree 179/2026 published in the Gazzetta UfficialeConfirmed
  3. Oct 23, 2026Decree 179/2026 takes effect, including Article 41Confirmed
  4. Dec 2, 2027EU AI Act high-risk rules for Annex III systems, including employment, applyExpected
  • Confirmed
  • Expected
Figure 1Italy's human-decision rule for employment applies more than a year before the EU AI Act's high-risk rules for employment AI. Source: Normattiva; EcNews; European Commission AI Act Service Desk (via 9to5AI's L1 explainer), as of October 24, 2026.

Law No. 132/2025, Italy's AI law, took effect on October 10, 2025. Its Article 11 already required employers to inform workers when they use automated decision or monitoring systems and barred discrimination in AI-assisted management. Decree 179/2026, issued under that law's delegation in Article 24, turns that into a hard rule on who decides. It also names AgID and ACN as Italy's national AI authorities under the AI Act.

Article 41 also keeps GDPR Article 22, which restricts decisions based solely on automated processing, in place, and adds an employment-specific line: a worker's consent doesn't lift the ban. For companies using models only through APIs, our guide to what the AI Act means for API users covers the EU-level duties. The first harmonised standard for high-risk AI quality management, which employers' AI vendors may use, is covered in our EN 18286 story.

What's confirmed, reported and uncertain

  • Confirmed (Normattiva and the Gazzetta Ufficiale text): the decree's number, dates and title, the October 23, 2026 entry into force, Articles 41 and 42, and the designation of AgID and ACN.
  • Reported (EcNews, Diritto.it): the "not merely formal" reading and the absence of further consequences beyond nullity in Article 41.
  • Uncertain: what counts as "effective and autonomous" human review in practice, how courts will apply nullity, and whether the decree's administrative fines could reach employers for Article 41 breaches. The text 9to5AI reviewed doesn't say so.

Read next

Comments (0)

More on EU AI Act

View all
Policy · NewsSpain's PP faces a criminal complaint over its AI deepfake election video: what's allegedSpain's PP posted an AI deepfake election video on October 21, 2026, showing Socialist-linked figures 'confessing' to wrongdoing. Leire Díez, one of those depicted, filed a criminal complaint at the National Court on October 23. The PP calls it satire and says it was labeled as AI. What's alleged, and what the EU AI Act requires.·5 min read
Policy · NewsEN 18286, the EU AI Act's first harmonised standard, is in the Official Journal: what it covers and what's still missingEN 18286, a quality management system standard for providers of high-risk AI, became the first harmonised standard under the EU AI Act when the Commission published its reference in the Official Journal on October 14, 2026. What EN 18286 covers, what 'presumption of conformity' means, which standards are still pending, and how it fits the AI Act's high-risk deadlines.·7 min read
Policy · NewsChatGPT starts watermarking text in the EU as the AI Act's marking deadline approachesOpenAI's October 5 rollout is the most visible sign yet of the AI Act's content-marking rule. Systems already on the market have until December 2 to comply.·5 min read
Open source · AnalysisOpen-weight licenses compared: Llama vs Apache, MIT and the new revenue-gated licensesWe read the license texts. What Llama, Apache 2.0, MIT, Gemma's terms and the newest Qwen and Mistral licenses actually let you do, and why "open weights" isn't "open source".·8 min read
The Week in AI · every Friday

Get the cluster, not just the headline.

The week’s biggest stories in AI and tech, what they mean, and what to read next.

Free. One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click.